Thursday, January 17, 2008

Decent Mookie Run, Avatar Races are Back, and Jec is Out

For starters today, congratulations out to Evil Wonka, Jordan and chitwood (whose blog I am not familiar with so if you have one please let me know in the comments and I will link you here) for being the three bloggers who won their $75 tokens in Wednesday night's token frenzy. In the end, a full 10% of this thing was bloggers at the start, including myself who lasted about 40 minutes before running into a higher Ace and heading home in the middle of the pack. So we had 12 runners in the frenzy from our group last night, but I know we can do better than that tonight. Many of you will already be on for the 9pm ET start of the latest Riverchasers tournament (password is "riverchasers"), so how about you all man up and multitable a li'l bit with the 9:45pm ET token frenzy as well? Get in there, take a stab at the top 19% finishers who all receive a $75 token, and then when you win it, I will blog about you in this spot on Friday morning. And more importantly, you can go and register for Sunday night's Big Game right away with your win. You wanna make an instant name for yourself among the blogging crew? Win the monthly Big Game. You'll not only take home hundreds in cash for the win, but the recognition for your greatness will be hard to even put a dollar value on. So get in there and make it happen, starting with tonight's token frenzy at 9:45pm ET on full tilt. $14 gives you basically a 1-in-5 shot of winning $75. Lezdoit.

And speaking of congratulations, let's not forget Numbbono who took it all down last night for his second Mookie win in the past 51 weeks. Now I'm not sure what is wrong with this guy to have only won two Mookie's in his career, but whatever it is he played very well on Wednesday night, got some good cards and played them aggressively in a few key spots, and stole a huge chiplead away from Jestocost shortly into the heads-up session to put himself in a position to win.

This week's Mookie was good times as both Mookie and myself final tabled for I think only the second time in history -- looking at my own personal Mookie history, there can't have been that many opportunities for the dual-final-tables for Mookie and myself, that is for sure. But with us having just finalized our prop bet, this made for some interesting possibilities as we headed into the final table, with me in 7th or 8th place out of 9 and Mookie closer to 3rd or 4th as I recall. But the funny thing is, Mookie and I took very different paths to get to the final table, even though we both ended up at the same place. Me, I played pretty poorly overall on the night. I've said this before when I've run deep in a blonkament from time to time, and this week's Mookie definitely fits the bill, as surely as I have sat here and talked about how great I played on many a night when I got donked out by some uberjackass early. Well, last night I started off running bad even before the Mookie started, and by the time that I ran AK into 66 on a K6x flop with two suits maybe 30 minutes in to the tournament, I was hardly surprised. That hand, which doubled up CK early after I reraised her allin with tptk -- something I almost never try to call an allin with early in any tournament but which my style often has me raising allin with -- dropped me down to below 700 chips and it was just another standard Mookie for me right from the earlygoing. Shortly after this point, I recorded my first of two ghey suckouts on the night when I moved in with KTs on a short stack and got called by loretta's AKo, only to see me turn a flush and then dodge the redraw to loretta's nut flush on the river. What can you do. Not too long after this, I picked up pocket Aces for the first time in two years in the Mookie, and I played these things to perfection. Utg+1, himself on a short stack, had raised the 60-chip blinds up to 180, so I just smooth called that raise from early middle position, hoping my slowplay would enable me to checkraise the flop allin in a heads-up pot. Instead, someone else also smooth called the 180 behind me from MP, and then the flop came King high. The first guy led out strong and quick, and I immediately put him on AK given his lack of thought despite two players who had called his preflop raise behind him. I figured with one pair I wanted the guy behind me outta there, so I put in a standard but not huge raise. The third guy folded and the first play instantly pushed. At this point I knew he had to have AK, so I called, he flipped up the big slick and I had doubled up again to 3520, my first time back over my starting stack of 3000 chips since the first few hands on the night.

Unfortunately, that was really the highlight of my night though. As I said I really didn't play very well, it took a suckout to even be alive at that point to receive the pocket Aces, and I don't believe I was dealt one other big hand all through the night. I did suck out on someone one more time when we were down to 3 tables left, and, being the Mookie, I of course got sucked out on 3 times on the night for various sized pots, including one double up somewhere around the middle thanks to a river 3-outer that would have put me in second place with around 25 players remaining. So overall I played pretty bad poker and could never get a dam thing going, despite lasting all the way to the final table. Despite my good finishiing position, let me tell you it was basically all stealing and restealing for me. I stole about 25 pots preflop (when I was finally eliminated in 5th place I had won a full 10% of the hands I had seen all night before the flop -- think about that stat!), and I had a few nice resteals to boot, one with 82o from DubSpoke (don't know him) and once at the final table with AQ against Mookie who had been a major card rack and I really figured probably had another big pair. So as I mentioned, in the end I busted in 5th place after sitting on a short stack all through the final two hours including the entire final table, and I stayed up for a bit to see if Mookie could end our prop bet early with a big win. In the end the other two stacks kept growing, and Mookie's earlier run of good cards came to an abrupt halt, with him busting in 3rd place by running the Mookie -- T8o -- into jestocost's pocket Kings. What can ya do. So it was a valiant effort by both Mookie and myself, but once again this week it was just not meant to be. I mean, obviously winning the Riverchasers and the donkament this week will take the sting out of this for me, but you really have to wonder if I ever am going to win the Mookie, for real. But hey at least I got back on to the Mookie 2008 stat board early on this year just like I did in the MATH earlier this week, and I'll take a 5th place finish in the Mook any day of the week given my usual performance and especially given my TPTK vs flopset in the first half hour last night.

Btw, did anyone else think CK did an awesome job on buddydank radio last night? I don't know about you guys, but I am having a great time finding out which of you donkeys make good radio personalities, and which of you don't. Personally, I could listen to Don, Chad and CK all night on that thing as far the guest hosts go. And meanwhile some others of our group that I was sure would be great radio personalities have ended up either being too shy to really talk, or just plain sucking in general. Weird. But hopefully CK makes another appearance soon as to me she was a real highlight in her first ever BDR appearance.

Before I go today, Chad turned me on to the startup again of the Avatar Races on full tilt, which begin with the Limit Avatar race tonight at 9pm ET. This is a $216 buyin tournament that pays out prize packages worth $1505 apiece comprised of buyins to all the limit events on the FTOPS VII schedule -- FTOPS #3 ($535 HORSE), FTOPS #5 ($216 LHE), FTOPS #11 ($216 Limit O8), FTOPS #14 ($322 razz) and FTOPS #16 ($216 stud). And the best part about this Limit Avatar Race? It is HORSE, which makes perfect sense considering it awards seats to HORSE, limit holdem, O8, razz and stud tournaments. That is awesome. It's been a few FTOPS series now that full tilt has been running these avatar races to award several FTOPS seats in one fell swoop, but this marks the first time for a limit avatar race dealing with just the limit events, begging the question of whether or not full tilt plans to run a no-limit avatar race as well this time around. Guess we'll have to wait and see on that one, but in the meantime I would love to win myself one of these limit avatar races. No I won't consider buying in to one for $216 cash, but of course knowing me there are three cool satellites already scheduled to play our way into tonight's $216 limit avatar race at 9pm ET. The first is a regular HORSE tournament with a $26 buyin at 5:35pm ET. No way I am online anywhere near that time, and in fact only dudes who play poker at work or those of you lucky enough not to have day jobs would ever be able to play that badboy. Next there is a turbo HORSE sat at 6:55pm ET, also with a $26 buyin. Still too early for me. My only shot at satelliting in, and it's still a pretty long shot time at that, is the final sat of the night, a $40 turbo HORSE sat at 7:20pm ET. I might possibly be able to get into this thing once in a long while, but as it is probably not tonight as I am once again getting crushed at work, mostly due to the fact that my two fuckbaggy coworkers more or less come and go as they please and rarely even come into the office anymore, while I do all their work and my jackboss just sits around in his self-imposed obliviion and lets it all happen under the guise of trying to be "accomodating". And while I suppose bending over and smearing his anus with vaseline before spreading his cheeks can be considered "accomodating", I guess I just have a different view than he does of what a manager's role is really supposed to be. But I digress.

OK that's all for today. I'm sure most of you heard this already on BDR last night, but BBTwo champion jeciimd was in fact eliminated on Wednesday evening ET from the Aussie Millions when his AA lost to 53s after a guy called a preflop raise, called a 2/3 pot sized bet on the flop with just the naked flush draw, and then hit on the turn. What can ya do. A great job and a great run by jec, who received more pocket Aces now in just about 11 hours of live casino play than I have received in my entire lifetime of playing holdem in any casino, but still that is a tough way to go. Hard to put a guy on a flush draw after he calls your preflop raise and calls a decent sized bet on the flop, with the flush draw filling once a good portion of your stack is already in the pot. Congratulations again to jec for a job well done and for representing well by making it through the first day of play in his first ever live casino tournament. For those of you who have played a big-buyin tournament live in a casino, you know that is quite an accomplishment for a first-timer.

Now go read Don's post from Wednesday. This is gonna be good, I can tell already.

See you tonight at the Riverchasers at 9pm ET, and at the token frenzy at 9:45!

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Avatar Race, and More on the Resteal

So Tuesday night was the first Avatar Race on full tilt, which again this year awards buyins to 13 of the 14 FTOPS events coming up in early- to mid-August plus an entry to a super sat for the 14th and largest buyin event. If you recall I had satellited about 5/6 of the way in by winning $240 cash on the bubble of Monday night's $75 satellite, so I put up the last 60 big ones and gave it a shot last night.

Things started off badly. Very badly. I pushed hard against a guy whom I've already noted as someone who resteals effectively against me and seems to have a good read on me generally. He's eliminated me from the big buyin full tilt mtts before, and I remember his name well. Long story short, he got me again. I had pocket Aces, the flop came something like Q66. He check-called my potbet on the flop. Then he checkraised me allin when then turn came a King. I folded my Aces to a big loss of probably close to a third of my stack. Note btw that my Aces streak is still alive and well, as it only pertained to cash games. Right now btw, it is either 31 for 31 or 32 for 32, I don't remember which, but there have been one or two more pocket rocket cash wins since my 30-win streak announcement. But this is tournament land, where I am free to lose with my Aces from time to time, and in that hand I did.

A few hands later was even worse. The flop came KK8 and I decided to represent a King and bet about 3/4 the pot, which that same opponent called after some pause. Then the turn ragged off and I checked, intending on checkraising, and my opponent responded with a bet of about half the pot. I checkraised him 3 times his bet, figuring for sure he lays down anything but a King in his hand here. He re-reraises me allin, putting my last 900 or so chips in jeopardy, so I fold meekly with my tail between my legs. My nemesis rakes the huge pot and shows me AK. Nice timing, Hoy.

But I perservered. I don't even remember the couple of big hands I had to get back in it, but I do know that I made some great plays and basically got back up over 6000 chips and went into the first break in around 36th of 110 or so remaining. In a good sign of things to come, Tuesday night's first Avatar Race of the season had a whopping 160 entrants, far more than in any other Avatar Race I can recall for the other FTOPSes, which meant that the top 10 spots would each receive what is a huge, $4500 prize package. 1 in 16. It means you have to play well, very well even, but there is also some chance for not being the best guy at the table on the night and still being able to persist to victory.

With about ten minutes left in the 2nd hour, with me in approximately 40th place of 70 players left, this big hand went down, once again against my nemesis, a guy named "tiltedpony":

Full Tilt Poker Game #2979428768: FTOPS Avatar Race (22499547), Table 17 - 80/160 - No Limit Hold'em - 22:48:08 ET - 2007/07/17

Seat 1: QT1 (4,655)

Seat 2: AJKHoosier1 (3,626)

Seat 3: vetiver (5,405), is sitting out

Seat 4: padirk165 (6,380)

Seat 5: zestfulyclean (5,415)

Seat 6: hoyazo (6,010)

Seat 7: ISPEWCHIPS (2,370)

Seat 8: tiltedpony (7,127)

Seat 9: Lord Admiral (3,710)

hoyazo posts the small blind of 80

ISPEWCHIPS posts the big blind of 160

The button is in seat #5

*** HOLE CARDS ***

Dealt to hoyazo [7c Kc]

tiltedpony calls 160

Lord Admiral folds

QT1 folds

AJKHoosier1 folds

vetiver folds

padirk165 folds

zestfulyclean folds

vetiver has returned

hoyazo calls 80 So it's folded around to me in the small blind with just the utg player limping. There is 400 in the pot, I have K7 sooted in clubs and it's just 80 more to me to call into a 3-way pot. Obviously I call.

ISPEWCHIPS checks

*** FLOP *** [Jc 4c 9d] Pot is $480.

hoyazo has 15 seconds left to act

hoyazo bets 420 Here I'm thinking I have flopped the 2nd-nut flush draw plus an overcard, against one utg limper (must be careful of that!) and a big blind who just checked. Unless someone else has hit a Jack here or maybe flopped an oesd, they should fold to my aggression here. I will do the usual and bet somewhere under the size of the pot.

ISPEWCHIPS folds Good.

tiltedpony calls 420 Not necessarily bad. This guy has floated against me before, and he could have 2nd or 3rd pair or a draw, or I of course have a 35% of hitting my flush draw in the next two cards and maybe winning some real chips from this guy.

*** TURN *** [Jc 4c 9d] [6h] Pot is $1320.

hoyazo has 15 seconds left to act

hoyazo bets 1,060 Well, I bet on the flop and got called by a guy who is a known floater. The offsuit raggy turn cannot reasonably possibly have helped either of us. I just don't read this guy for being ahead of me right now. This player limp-called from utg before the flop, and although sometimes that means Aces, he has played this hand so unbelievably passively that I cannot possibly believe he would be butchering pocket Aces this badly. He's a good player. Thus, I have to put him on either a low pair, a low Ace or low suited connectors. Maybe 98 or A4 to have called on this flop. Maybe he still has a draw which clearly missed on the turn. With any of these hands I see him folding here to a properly-sized bet. With the 1060 bet I have set my opponent's pot odds right where I want them to prevent flush and straight draws from calling anywhere near their roughly 1-in-5 chances of filling, and also far more than anything other than top pair can call in the hopes of hitting his kicker.

tiltedpony calls 1,060 Oops.

*** RIVER *** [Jc 4c 9d 6h] [9c] Pot is $3440.

hoyazo has 15 seconds left to act Bingo!!! I actually hit a draw and nailed my flush on the river. It did pair the 2nd card on the flop, but that's actually a good thing for me, since I've been betting the whole way, I know this guy can't possibly put me on a made flush here. This means that he will have to think his trip 9s are good if he just made that. So what do I do to get the most chips from this guy? Well, he's called me on two streets, and I suspect he might have just made trips with the river 9, or perhaps two pairs or something like that, surely something that loses to my rivered flush. Since I think he might be strong, and he's already called progressively larger bets from me on two streets, I'm just going allin, which is actually only about 34% bigger than the current pot size anyways. If I double up I'm in the top 4 players in the tournament with 70 remaining, and the top 10 getting seats. It's go time.

hoyazo bets 4,370, and is all in

tiltedpony has 15 seconds left to act He is delaying. He obviously doesn't have anything strong. Time to try to elicit the call.

hoyazo: FOLD

hoyazo: you can do it

tiltedpony calls 4,370 Haha what an effing donkey to have fallen for that!

*** SHOW DOWN ***

hoyazo shows [7c Kc] a flush, King high Read it n weep, dickhead!

tiltedpony shows [Qc Ac] a flush, Ace high Uh...Whaa???????

tiltedpony wins the pot (12,180) with a flush, Ace high

hoyazo stands up Dazed. Did he just call 1060 into a 2380 pot with just a flush draw? And please don't quote me the two overcards. With the way I bet this hand, only a donkass counts on 6 more outs with the Aces and Queens. And I won't even point out that he still doesn't have the right odds even adding 6 overcards as outs. Did that just happen?

*** SUMMARY ***

Total pot 12,180 | Rake 0

Board: [Jc 4c 9d 6h 9c]

Seat 1: QT1 didn't bet (folded)

Seat 2: AJKHoosier1 didn't bet (folded)

Seat 3: vetiver didn't bet (folded)

Seat 4: padirk165 didn't bet (folded)

Seat 5: zestfulyclean (button) didn't bet (folded)

Seat 6: hoyazo (small blind) showed [7c Kc] and lost with a flush, King high

Seat 7: ISPEWCHIPS (big blind) folded on the Flop

Seat 8: tiltedpony showed [Qc Ac] and won (12,180) with a flush, Ace high

Seat 9: Lord Admiral didn't bet (folded)


So that's how I didn't win the Avatar Race in my first attempt.

I have the worst fucking luck ever with flushes. Let me put it this way -- for you poker tracker guys n gals out there, my lifetime stats over more than 10,000 hands now are that I have lost over $1300 with flushes overall. No that's not a typo -- I have actually managed to lose over $1300 when I have made flushes on the hand. Now, lest you starting thinking the worst about me, let me clarify a few things. I reviewed all 19 of my flushes where I've gone to showdown (I have won 11 and lost 8). In only one instance did I make the flush with just one of my hole cards, a hand which I went on to win anyways. So in 18 separate hands since I started running pokertracker, I've made two-card flushes, and I've somehow lost 8 of them! And again before you get all Sherlock Holmes and try to figure this out, let me also clarify that in not a single one of these instances did I lose to a full house (or better). Not one. So I'm not betting with just one-card 8-high flushes and losing to another high one-card flush. And I'm not at all that guy betting the flush as hard as possible when the board is paired. Nope, instead, I have taken 18 two-card flushes to showdown, and lost 8 of those 18 to higher two-card flushes. On two occasions these flushes were even backdoor flushes made on the turn and river. Still lost to a higher backdoor flush. Twice in 10,000 hands! So even though I am well positive with trips / set and obviously with full house or better, in the middle of all that is me down over 1300 bucks with made fucking two-card non-paired-board flushes. Flush over flush is the bane of my cash existence right now, and last night that spilled over into my tournament game to combine with a horrifically poor call by a longtime nemesis of mine to eliminate me from what would have been awesome position in the first Avatar Race on full tilt. F flush-over-flush. I hope flush over flush gets AIDS. Please.

OK so I wanted to talk a little bit more today about stealing and restealing, which was the topic of my post from this past Monday. I got a lot of good comments to that post, and I thought I would address some of those comments specifically, in addition to giving my own thoughts on some concepts introduced in those comments, because I do have some more to say about the topic overall. The resteal is one of my favorite moves, after all.

Schaubs left a comment to Monday's post where he wanted to know do I still apply these same general rules on restealing regardless of the size of the tournament I am in? Generally speaking, yes. I mean, in a blonkament that is only 20-70 people or so, the chip stacks never get real big, and there just isn't the long (two hours or more, somtimes) period near the end when the Ms are low basically across the board where stealing and especially restealing become so important. But once you get up into the several hundreds of players, and on to as large as any tournament I've ever played in, I'm stealing and restealing like this near the end all the time. I almost never resteal early in a tournament because the blinds and antes don't make you, but in any largeish event, by definition just because of the structure itself there's going to be a looooong time where stealing is just about all you'll be doing if you want to stay ahead of the blinds.

And yes, Schaubs, I do use a similar strategy during bubble play, although obviously you have to be more careful because you don't want to endanger your own position vis a vis the bubble. In other words, if I'm a prohibitively huge stack with 15 players left in an mtt satellite where 14 players win the seat, I am not likely to steal or resteal much. Why bother? Why take the risk with an abjectly huge stack when I can probably just sit around and wait for someone to bust and then win my seat? Generally I would only steal and certainly only resteal if I thought there was some chance I might actually need those chips for later in the tournament. Otherwise it's often not worth the risk.

Blinders, thanks for weighing in with the ubertight view. Suffice it to say, not only is restealing a +EV move if it is executed correctly, but it is the only way to have any chance of winning a large mtt. I would estimate you probably need to resteal several times in the last few hours of any big mtt if you are to win it, period. I don't think there's any other way as the blinds and antes get huge and the tables get shorthanded so those blinds are coming around faster and faster. You'd have to be Astinthe luckiest guy in the world to get enough good cards to wait without ever making moves with nothing great in that situation. And don't get me wrong, as I mentioned in my original post, you will surely donk yourself right out of a number of these mtts with less than strong hands against guys who were raising with actual good cards. No doubt you will, so to that extent in any individual tournament, of course the resteal can be a -EV move. But overall it is an absolutely key piece of any really deep mtt run, in particular online where the structures are sufficiently fast to basically ensure low Ms for most of the players through most of the last few hours of the event.

Blinders and a number of the other commenters to Monday's post also raised a few more factors that clearly do weigh on the decision of whether or not to resteal. Blinders correctly mentions things like "position of the raiser, your position, stack sizes, raisers image, your image", all of which weigh no doubt. As a poker player late in an mtt you are screwing up if you're not using every single bit of information that is available to you when making every single decision. I did not mention position of the raiser or my own position in the analysis in my original post, but of course those do go into the equation. I didn't mention them because for me they are almost always the same in the situations where I might consider a move like a resteal. In other words, you're almost never in early or middle position to do a resteal. I'm not limping into hardly any pots very late in an mtt, so the only time I would ever resteal is from late position. Similarly, restealing from an utg raiser is something I'm almost never doing late in an mtt, unless I have personally observed the guy raising utg so often that I know he must be stealing with those hands, and even then it is almost too risky of a move to get too involved in doing against an utg raiser. So, almost all the time where the resteals happen -- at least for me in the big mtts -- is when I am on the button or in one of the blinds, and when the stealing player is in the cutoff, the button, or maybe in the small blind vs. my big blind. So I might take into account the relative positions of the players involved, but in mostly every case it is basically the same for me because I try not to get myself into positions where I am restealing from an utg guy who probably has a strong hand to begin with.

The other factor Blinders mentioned are the relative images of the players involved (he mentioned stack sizes too, but I wrote a great deal about that already on Monday). But Blinders is totally correct, the raiser's image plays heavily in this decision. This is why I wrote the other day about targeting players whom I have seen open-raising quite a bit from late position already at the table. These are the guys who you know like to steal with less than premium cards in the right spots -- the guys with the stealy, loose-late images -- so these are the guys I like to do most of my resteal attempts from. Similarly, my own image clearly plays into the resteal decision as well. I didn't mention this specifically in my post because if you've ever watched me late in an mtt, you know that I raise all the time. Nobody can really get much of a read on me because I have raised, and I even reraise people enough -- with some good hands and some bad ones -- that my own image is usually basically the same by the time we are down to the final few tables in any big mtt. But it's certainly something you have to keep in mind when deciding whether or not to resteal -- i.e., if you've just been caught twice in a row trying to resteal from a late-position open-raiser and having to show shiat cards, then a third resteal attempt is not nearly as likely to be met with the fold that you so desperately want. That is basic poker psychology, but something you certainly need to think about in late-stage mtt play if you are to truly take advantage of all the available information out there.

DaSwam, whom I think is a first-time commenter on my blog, asked on Monday how much I typically bet when I steal and when I resteal. Good questions. Anyone who has played a lot with me will know that I am a very standard raise amount kind of a guy. In other words, I tend to raise around 3x with any kind of a hand, from any position, until the antes are big. Once the antes are big enough late enough into a large mtt, I will increase my standard raise amount to something more like 4x or even 5x the big blind, to make sure I am giving any kind of soooted connector or whatever poor odds to take a flop and try to bust me. So if there's already 5000 in the pot but the big blind is only 2400 (because there are $200 antes from all 7 people around the table), I'm not going to just bump it up to 3x the 2400 or 7200 to do a late-position steal attempt. If there's already 5000 in the pot, a raise to 7200 is going to give a lot of hands a lot of odds to make the call. In that spot I will want to probably close to double what's already in the pot, which is 4x the big blind or more, as a result of the big portion of the pot created by the antes.

For restealing, I tend to have a similar approach. Remember, with a true resteal, your objective is clearly to get your opponent to fold the hand he just open-raised with from late position. You don't typically want a call, or else it's not really a re-steal, but rather a regular re-raise with a strong hand that you don't mind if he calls you with. But for a resteal, my objective is generally to reraise enough so that the guy has to fold anything but his strongest hands. So, let's take my example above again here. 7-handed table, 1200-2400 blinds and a 200 ante. There's 5000 in the pot before the hand even begins, and it folds around to the button, a guy I have observed steal-raising several times already in the past half hour or so, who bumps the bet up to 10k, just more than 4 times the big blind. Say he has 100,000 chips in his stack after the 10k bet here. Here I will want to reraise him up to something like 30k or 40k. I will amost always raise at least 3 times his steal-raise, because that's the kind of bet that it's going to take to get him to lay down his Q9 or 76s that he is stealing with here. And if he wants to call me for that huge of a reraise with a hand like Q9 or 76s, then I'm going to have ample opportunity to get him out of this pot on the flop or after. But again, remember the idea is to get this guy out of the pot when you're restealing, so a 2x reraise to me is not designed to get him to fold.

I also try to look at how many chips I will have left after I put in this big resteal raise here. If the amount I have left compared to the amount already in the pot will likely pot-commit me, then so be it and then I'm just going to move allin. Similarly, if I look at my stealing opponent's stack and think that even a 3x or 4x reraise of his steal raise will not likely be enough to get him to fold what is an otherwise large stack, but I think that an allin re-reraise by me is big enough to get him to fold, I might move in there as well instead of just the normal 3x or 4x reraise. But to me the allin decisions are basically made with reference to either my stack size and/or my opponent's stack size, and not at all with reference to the cards I'm holding.

And DaSwam made one other important question/point at the end of his comment on Monday as well: it is absolutely crucial, at least for my game, that I do not betray the strength of my cards at all by the sizing of any of these steals or resteals. In other words, if I have pocket Aces in the big blind, and the button puts in an obvious 4x steal-raise, I will reraise him the exact same 3x or 4x that I would raise if I had shiat for cards but was just sure he was stealing. The bottom line fact is that, while I cannot speak for the quality of play or experience of any individual at any final table that you might happen to be playing at, in general the good, experienced, sophisticated players at any poker table will easily figure you out if your idea is to always push in when you have a super strong hand on a reraise, or just reraise 3x with the weaker holdings, or vice versa. As those of you who play with me often will know, my game is about raising, raising with a lot of preflop holdings and a lot of flops and turns, etc., so the entire focus of my game relies on my making the exact same moves with my lesser raising hands as I do with my Aces and Kings and big slicks. I suggest that other newer players follow that same approach, but I also am well aware that there are a number of winning styles of poker that people can play. If yours involves you trapping a lot with big cards, more power to you. That ain't me. I don't like letting in lesser hands with my pocket premiums and then losing to those hands. I'd rather take those pots down early with my monsters, and let the big pots take care of themselves during any mtt.

Alan asked a good question the other day as far as how do I counter a resteal. Being someone who loves the resteal in late-stage mtt play as much as I do, I loved this question. The answer is, there is no really good strategy for "countering" a resteal. The best move is usually to fold, which is why the resteal is such a great move. And if you actually happen to have a hand, this is a situation where I find the most usefulness for my read of a particular player and a particular situation. The example Alan gave was just about one of the toughest decisions you're going to run into late in an mtt -- he had AJ, open-raised from late position before the flop, and another player reraised him allin. What do you do with a hand like AJ? There's just no good answer, other than to say you dig deep, use everything you've ever seen about your opponent and his play, how many players are at the table, the relative stack sizes and if that might make it more or less likely for someone to be pushing in light here or more likely that they would have to have a big big hand to be playing back like that, etc. You just have to look at your cards and look at all those factors involved, and decide if you think your AJ is best. Generally speaking, I would be inclined to fold the JackAce, because generally speaking the JackAce is complete and utter shit against an allin reraise, even shorthanded, but it's certainly the case that most of the blonkeys don't know this fact, so who knows what I would've done in your situation. One of the real beauties of the resteal is that it puts your opponent to a lot of tough decisions like this. What if he has AJ like Alan had here? To me I am likely to fold that hand, all other things being equal. Similarly what if he has 77? Are you going to call an allin reraise with 77? All things equal, I don't want to call there where I have to figure I am likely at best a 51% favorite. Restealing can be very effective for this reason, even against players who are not actively stealing with ATC but rather are waiting only for, say, the top 50% or even less of hands to make stealy moves.

I think I mentioned this earlier already, but to answer LJ's question, I am generally not even thinking about restealing from anyone early in tournaments, only rather when the blinds and antes get sufficiently big, and the M's get sufficiently small, to warrant taking on the risk that you take every time you resteal with less than a premium hand. In general, restealing early in tournaments is a recipe for not lasting the first hour. Especially in blonkaments, you have to start off tight (not weak, just tight) and you can't be risking bluffing off half your stack with nothing at the beginning too many times, or you're gonna get burned. I've been there more times than I can count, I would know.

I liked Astin's comment to my Monday post as well, in that it raised another interesting factor that I didn't get into in my post on Monday, which is the relative bet size of your opponent. In other words, you have to pay attention to which opponents tend to make their steal-raised all 3x the big blind, or which guys tend to go bigger whenever they are raising without much of a hand. I specifically ommitted this from my earlier post because, frankly, this tell is so easily faked by any kind of a sophisticated player, so there is not much usefulness of it standing-alone in my own game, but I'd be lying if I said I never use relative bet sizing (relative to the person's other similar bets under different circumstances) to aid in steal-resteal decisions. Just be careful of jumping all over somebody with a resteal just because they only min-raised from the button into an unopened pot. Minraising can mean a lot of different things to a lot of different people, and just because someone isn't stealing with a huge raise relative to the blinds, that doesn't meant that they aren't playing a strong hand a little bit slow to try to drum up some action.

Lastly, anybody have any clue what this "DP" character was getting at in his comment on Monday? I assume maybe he is just on drugs or something, as the comment he left hardly makes English sense. Any ideas are welcome.

Ha ha.

See you tonight at 10pm ET at the Mookie. Same thing as with the MATH this past Monday (I'm talking to you, emptyman) -- anyone and everyone is welcome to join in, whether you've played in this event before or not, whether you have a blog or not, and even whether you have even played poker before or not. The Mookie buyin is $11 on full tilt, it is at 10pm ET every Wednesday night, and the password is always "vegas1". It's the largest weekly gathering of bloggers and non-bloggers in a private tournament setting, and I cannot possibly win the tournament due to a curse laid upon my ancestors about a thousand years ago, so I come to donate to the cause week-in and week-out. Tonight is your night to be there too.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

FTOPS Returns, and MATH Recap

I can't believe it since it seems like it was just yesterday, but apparently it is already FTOPS time again on full tilt. I know that because, starting with a trickle of satellites over the weekend, and then now a full-blown slate of mtt satellites on Monday night, the full tilt tournament lobby is now jam packed with those blue-font offerings that advertsie satellites to what will now be the most events full tilt has ever packed into one FTOPS, as well as host to the largest-ever FTOPS Main Event with a $2 million guarantee as well as the first-ever two-day FTOPS event.

One thing full tilt has brought back from last time around is the Avatar Race, which is a bigass megasatellite that awards entries into a number of the FTOPS tournaments all in one fell swoop. A couple of FTOPS's ago, the Avatar Race was a $75 buyin and awarded a package including entries into the FTOPS ME as well as two other FTOPS tournaments. In the last FTOPS this past May, the Avatar Races were held three nights a week, sported a $200 buyin and awarded entries into five of the FTOPS tournaments, again including the Main Event. Well, this time around full tilt has really outdone itself. Of the 15 total FTOPS events running in mid-August this year, the Avatar Races starting this week will award seats to a whopping 14 of the 15 tournaments, plus a satellite entry into the one large buyin, two-day event in the middle of the FTOPS. The buyin of course is up once again for these Avatar Race megasatellites -- now $300 -- and the first one runs on Tuesday night at 9pm ET. Clearly this is the class of all the ways to get in to the FTOPS tournaments, and after a very profitable FTOPS IV for me this past May, I would absolutely love to get back into all of those events when August rolls around in a few weeks.

In that regard, last night I entered the first Avatar Race satellite that I saw when I logged on, which was the $75 buyin mtt satellite that ended up with 24 runners. The top 4 finishers won $300 seats to Tuesday night's Avatar Race, and 5th place won $240. Long story short, I made it to 5th place, watched the short stack double-up twice on allin calls with hands like 55 and KTs (soooted donk), watched my own favorite hand get donked for half my stack, and then tiled out the rest of the way. I took the $240 cash and immediately bought in for the other $60 to the Avatar Race. Basically whenever I go out on the seat bubble in an mtt sat and receive cash that would enable me to buy in to the underlying tournament at a significant discount, I almost always buy right in. So look for me tonight at 9pm ET in the first FTOPS V Avatar Race on full tilt.

And hey, with all this discussion of the FTOPS coming back, I won't even need to mention the cash game stacking I took at much higher than my normal limits while I was on tilt after this tournament, after getting allin ahead before the flop with pocket Queens. You can guess the results, although I'll tell you it wasn't an overcard that did me in. It was the dreaded river four-flush. Loveit. Assholes!

So last night's Mondays at the Hoy tournament had 24 runners, including one first-timer by the name of emptyman. Well, his game proved to be far short of empty, as he entered the final table in 5th place of 9 remaining players, and eventually went on to win the tournament outright. It really is funny the amount of success brand new MATH players have had in this tournament. I personally remember at least four times where someone won their first-ever entrance into the MATH, and now emptyman is the latest in a long line of players with this on their resume.

I did not stay up past the first few eliminations from the final table, so I can't tell you how it happened. What I can say is this: Bayne was the second one out. Again. That's my boy. I will also say that I no longer feel super tilty and donkish heading into these post-BBT blonkaments. My game is definitely on right now, and I am already looking forward to my next big blonkament score. Who knows, will this week's Mookie on Wednesday night be the day for me?

No. Surely not.

Nonetheless, congratulations are in order to emptyman who won this week's MATH title outright, including $288 cash money for his efforts (empty, if you have a blog please leave it in the comments and I will link you up here). Coming in 2nd place and winning $172.80 on the week was perpetual MATH casher Columbo, who is really coming into his own with what must be his 4th or 5th MATH cash of the year in addition to hosting the WPBT tournaments that include the HORSE donkfest this coming Sunday night at 9pm ET. And rounding out this week's cashers, coming up with his second MATH cash of the year, is none other than jeciimd who overcame a couple of setup hands early on to hold on for the the third place finish and $115.20 that goes along with it.

And here is the updated 2007 MATH moneyboard including this week's exciting action:

1. Bayne_s $1175
2. Columbo $974
3. Hoyazo $849
4. VinNay $775
5. cmitch $774
6. Iggy $745
7. NewinNov $677
8. Lucko21 $665
9. Astin $616
10. Tripjax $561
11. Julius Goat $507
12. mtnrider81 $492
13. Chad $485
14. scots_chris $474
15. Fuel55 $458
16. RecessRampage $434
17. Otis $429
18. Miami Don $402
19. Jordan $382
20. Blinders $379
21. Pirate Wes $372
22. lightning36 $371
23. PokerBrian322 $365
24. IslandBum1 $357
25. ChapelncHill $353
26. Zeem $330
27. Mike_Maloney $326
28 oossuuu754 $312
29. leftylu $295
30. Waffles $294
31. Emptyman $288
31. Wigginx $288
33. ScottMc $282
34. Fishy McDonk $277
35. Manik79 $252
36. Wippy1313 $248
37. Byron $234
38. wwonka69 $216
39. Omega_man_99 $210
40. Pushmonkey72 $208
41. Buddydank $197
42. jeciimd $195
43. bartonfa $180
44. 23Skidoo $176
45. Santa Clauss $170
46. Iakaris $162
46. Smokkee $162
48. cemfredmd $156
48. NumbBono $156
50. lester000 $147
51. LJ $146
52. Heffmike $145
53. brdweb $143
54. DDionysus $137
55. Patchmaster $135
56. InstantTragedy $129
57. Ganton516 $114
58. Fluxer $110
59. Irongirl $109
60. Gracie $94
60. Scurvydog $94
62. Shag0103 $84
63. crazdgamer $82
64. PhinCity $80
65. maf212 $78
66. Alceste $71
66. dbirider $71
68. Easycure $67
69. Rake Feeder $53

So again, emptyman enters the 2007 moneyboard in 31st place with this week's victory, while jeciimd climbs from the bottom of the list up to 42nd place with his 3rd place cash. And the biggest story is Columbo, who used I think his 5th Hoy cash of the year to leapfrog yours truly into 2nd place overall on the 2007 moneyboard. Bayne still leads the board at this point thanks to some impressive performances during the BBT days, but now Columbo is pressing hard on Bayne's heels as he strives to become the second player to cross the $1000 mark in winnings from the MATH during 2007.

I was going to write more about the resteal after my post from yesterday, but in the interest of time I will get this post up today and leave the further resteal comments for tomorrow. Come check me out tonight in the Avatar Race at 9pm ET as well as the 50-50 which I plan to make my triumphant return to tonight after last week's back to back final tables.

Labels: , ,

Monday, April 23, 2007

MATH, the 400k, and More on the FTOPS Satellites

The Battle of the Blogger Tournaments returns this week with two tournaments for your donking pleasure, starting with tonight's Mondays at the Hoy tournament at 10pm ET on full tilt:



Remember, the buyin for the new full-tilt-bound MATH tournament is a Tier I token or $26 cash, and it is a double-stack tournament, meaning that everyone who plays will start off with 3000 chips instead of the normal 1500 chips for most of full tilt's other multi-table events. The action has been fast and furious over the past three weeks at the MATH since the BBT took effect, and the result has been prize pools of well over a thousand bucks for each. Almost anyone can capture the top spot on the 2007 MATH moneyboard with a victory this evening, and then you won't have to listen to my incessant blogadoccio for another week because I'm still on the top of the list. So why not take your shot at fame and notoriety by taking over the yearly money lead from me tonight at Mondays at the Hoy!

Anyways, as far as my weekend of poker went, I think I can sum it up in one word: tilt. I didn't do anything much on Friday or Saturday night, only playing maybe one or two tournaments over the two days, but one thing I did do was play in the Sunday afternoon 400k guaranteed on full tilt. Basically I had watched the kids all afternoon on Saturday, and the Hammer Wife, being the goddess that she is, suggested to me for the second straight week that I should just play the big weekly guaranteed tourney on full tilt to get some time to myself to make up for my giving her Saturday afternoon off with her family. And who am I to argue with that logic, huh?

OK so fast forward to Sunday evening, where I'm sitting in the 400k guaranteed, and then I run into the following gem after nearly doubling my stack early against a donk who insisted on calling multiple bets from me with just an inside straight draw:

I limp utg with Aces (notice guys, not with AJ, but with pocket Aces):



Of course here I'm hoping someone will raise it behind me, so I can repop it with the best of all possble starting holdem hands. This move tends to work especially well for me, as I come in raising in maybe 95% of the hands I choose to play before the flop, so when I limp up front at a table I've sat at for a while, people tend to smell weakness and try to take the action away from me right away. I get my wish:



Yup. A raiser and a caller of that raise. I love it. So what do I do here? Of course, I make the baby Jebus cry with a min-reraise:



Now if this guy can't smell the Aces yet, after I limp UTG and then min-reraise a 4x raiser and a caller of that raise, then he's a clown. Ok so he's a clown. Awesome. So I'm seeing a flop 3-handed, although the first guy to my left is already allin, and it's just between me and the guy at the bottom of the screen who couldn't sniff out my Aces.



Shitty flop for my Aces, no doubt. But, since this guy called a big raise preflop with me having already limped UTG as well, I can't really be afraid of his hand at this point. In my head he's gotta have a pair of face cards or AK, and although you tighty donks out there are thinking "Oh no he's made a set of 7s!", in reality that is plainly speaking a downright foolish conclusion. Of course. So I'm allin. As I have him on a high pocket pair, I think I have to do this here since I am as close to knowing I'm ahead of him, given the preflop action, as I could possibly be, and I think there's a good chance that he'll call me as well.



He calls my allin on the flop and...BINGO!!! I'm going to be in 2nd place out of about 1750 players remaining after I take down this 11,481-chip pot. The first guy is an uberdonk moving allin with KTo. The second guy, he's just the chump who ran his KK into AA. Man I love being the guy with the Aces against the Kings once in a long while. The turn is a harmless 3, and I'm one card away from being off to a 2nd place start in the 400k guaranteed. Which, btw, I'm totally going to win.



To describe this as "crushing" doesn't even begin to do justice to the way I felt when that King hit the river. That fucknut had one card and one card only that could win him the big portion of this pot. Yes the donk on the right had his four 9's as well, but even if one of them hit I'm still winning about 8500 chips on the hand overall since his was just the smaller main pot. I think my favorite part about the fucking shitcocking King on the river is that the donk on the right already has the third King in his hand, meaning that this is literally the only card left in the deck for mister 14141414 to hit on the river. There goes my buyin, and my chance to win the 75k first prize or whatever it is. All stolen away from me by the fuckers at full tilt. I'm beside myself as I write this right now. Time to get drunk. Thanks to my late-afternon grocery run today, tonight's buzz will be brought to you be the good Irishmen who make Killian's Red.

And hey, at least this is some solid kind of player to be off to a 2nd place start in the first hour of the 400k guaranteed on full tilt, right? Check out 14141414's lifetime stats:



Great. Nothing like a 49-to-1 loss on the river to an abject donkass muggafugga to start your poker week, to a guy with four cash wins of any kind in full tilt mtt's in his entire life, and none larger than $29 (yes you read that right, $29), until winning his way in to the 400k on Sunday in a 1215-person, $50 buyin mtt satellite which awarded seats to the top 300 or so entrants. That's the kind of donk who took this pot from me, and who, by the way, managed to end near the bottom of the top 100 in the 400k (I checked along the way) for a cash payout of around $350 thanks to that redickusuckout. 49 to 1. One in 50 times he hits that shit. With his Kings. To beat my Aces. Un. Fucking. Believable. And you just know I would have done so much more with that huge starting stack than making less than twice the buyin for this tournament. Grrrrrr.

Now, since this is me we're talking about, let's just say that I spent the rest of Sunday night taking out my anger about this beat on my bankroll. As if my roll had anything to do with causing this redickushitness. I played 3 or 4 ftops satellites, donking easily and stoopidly out of all but one of them. In the fourth, an mtt satellite to FTOPS Event #1, I was way, way out in first place with 8 players left, with the top 3 finishers winning seats, as I had a chip stack that was more than 3 times bigger then the guy then in fourth place. I could have basically folded to the money at that point. Well, jump ahead an hour later and not one, not two but three AK losses to QQ, and even still I had clawed my way back into second place when the first place guy calls my allin reraise with his A5s against my pocket 6s (what a fucking donkeysucker!), he hits his Ace on the flop and IGH in 5th place. I still can't believe the way that last one happened. But it's ok, because I was just hemorraging my roll on Sunday. Completely bleeding it out. Most of it, being done on purpose by me. I mean, I would enter tournaments, solely with the intent of moving allin preflop the first time I found any two face cards, regardless of the other action at the table. I knew I was tilting but I just didn't care. This is me at my worst, as I have always had a problem with tilt and that beat in the 400k just set me off redickulously. I know I need to get better about this, I always have known, and if you can believe it I'm actually much better about it nowadays than I was a year or two ago. But I'm still a terrible tilter, make no mistake. And the result of last night's self-inflicted rampage? I tilted off around a third of my existing roll on full tilt. Just like that. Mostly on purpose. It was unreal. I'm embarrassed to even admit that, but it's true. Now, I don't keep a huge amount of money on any of the poker sites anymore so it's not like I lost 5 grand or anything. But believe me when I say, this was one of the worst nights of tilt in my entire life of playing poker. Perhaps even the worst.

I've written about this several times before, but the 400k debacle was one of the very worst kind of bad beats to me. I've always said, at least to me, it's one thing to lose to a bad beat when the other guy is blinded in, or basically had the pot odds and had to get allin or whatever. Those suck ballz, and they too can tilt me no doubt. But in my head it's a whole other ballgame when I use superior play and trickery, fucking fool some guy (or in this case, two guys) into putting all their chips into play when I have deliberately made them sure they're ahead, and then I spring my trap on them. I think about that feeling in the stomachs of my two 400k opponents who got allin preflop and on the flop in that hand. I think about them literally involunatarily sucking in air when they saw my Aces, in particular the guy with the Kings. I think about him seeing the third King in the other allin opponent's hand, and knowing it was over. I just love knowing how he had to deal in the first couple milliseconds with knowing that he just got played, played by the ultimate player. I love knowing that I caused him to feel that way, and to feel that overwhelming sense of loss, in what I assume was his first-ever 400k guaranteed tournament, and the biggest-buyin event he's ever played in. And then to have it all raped away from me by a 49-to-1 card at the river, it just drives me nucking futs. Like I've said, it's one thing to just lose to a bad beat that happens because of the randomness of the cards. But when I set up the fucking beat to begin with, when I use my poker skills and my deception to trick someone into giving me all their chips, I have a major problem dealing with losing like that.

Given the magnitude of the tournament itself, the fact that I would have been off to a second-place start within the first hour, and just given the redickulousness of my 98% favorite on the river, this hand in the 400k is without a doubt one of my all-time worst bad beats. It may or may not be the literal #1 worst, I don't know -- my wife suggested my WSOP beat at the hands of Joe Hachem last year, and maybe she's right -- but it is without a doubt in the top few. And man did it suck, and it ended up costing me a lot more than just my shot at the 75k first prize. A third of my full tilt roll later, and I'm still trying to find my footing. I can only hope that tonight I am able to play with some more stability than on Sunday, or else it's gonna be another short run for me in the Hoy. At least I did manage to win a little at the $200 nlh 6-max cash tables last night, as I sat at a table that ended up having fellow poker blogger nabomb at it, and both of us played most of the session at or above the $300 mark thanks to some early wins and consistently solid play, which helped to erase some earlier cash losses when my tilt rage was at its worst. Still, I head into this evening's poker play with probably more questions than answers, and I'm just hoping something good happens early on for me or it could be a short night for me on a lot of fronts. In fact, look for me at the Hoy because I'm going to have to be drunk on my Killian's already by the time that badboy starts if I'm ever going to be calm enough to even consider playing +EV poker. And a drunk Hoyazo is always a threat to make a dumb play, and even more of a threat to go off on somebody in the chat and/or to write a drunken rant for tomorrow's blog post. Ahhh the joys of being an angry, tilting drunk.

OK well after that happy little interlude, I just want to get back to the new "Avatar Race" on full tilt, as promised last week. After having a weekend to check things out, here's the scoop. So the FTOPS is coming up again, ten events as always, ranging from May 11 to May 20 next month. As with the past three FTOPS series, the overall winner of the entire series in FTOPS points will win his or her own avatar created specially for him or her for use on full tilt in the future. As a result, in the past, full tilt has run something called an "avatar race", which is a multi-event satellite that awards the winner(s) with seats to multiple of the FTOPS tournaments, and hence it is called an "avatar race" since it is a satellite to help someone get a leg up in the race for the avatar by entering them in multiple FTOPS events for one satellite victory. Anyways, as recently as FTOPS III this past February, I actually won an avatar race so I know from experience, this was a $75 (tier II token) buyin, and it awarded seats to three of the ten FTOPS events -- events #1, 6 and 8 if you're counting.

Well, I guess full tilt decided that they are really in to the whole avatar race idea, as they have expanded the concept even further for FTOPS IV in May. Just like in February, full tilt now runs an avatar race once every night at 10:30pm ET. The newly created avatar race carries a $216 buyin, typical of full tilt's larger buyin tournaments, what I tend to think of as a Tier III sort of buyin, even though Tier III tokens do not exist (yet) on the site. In addition to expanding the buyin for the avatar race since FTOPS III, full tilt has also expanded the prize package for this nightly event, which now awards a seat to FTOPS Events #1, 3, 6, 8 and 10 (the main event). So winning one of these seats is a quick n easy way to get into five of the 10 FTOPS tournaments, just like that. It's a really cool idea, and the best part is that, due to the $216 buyin and the $1505 total prize package award, it is basically one avatar race winner for every 7.5 entrants. So if you get the 40 or so entrants that has been common during the first few days of this event, the top 5 finishers will win the 5 FTOPS seats. You really can't do much better than those odds as far as a quality mtt satellite, and for a guy like me this is basically just what I'm looking for.

Now, after tilting off a third of my online roll this weekend, I can't exactly be buying in to this $216 avatar race for cash very regularly. But, never fear, since full tilt continues to be the smartest- and best-run online poker site out there, they have devised a range of five nightly satellites to the avatar race, which run every single night between 7:45pm ET and 8:40pm ET for your satelliting pleasure. Those satellites, all of which are very reasonably priced, are:

7:45pm ET -- $10 turbo nlh mtt with one guaranteed winner. This one is cheap, but it also does not IMO offer a very favorable number of winners for the difficulty of coming in first place out of the entire field. Remember, you need 44 players in order to award just two avatar race seats, and so far this satellite has yet to approach the 44 player plateau.

8pm ET - $14 turbo nlh mtt, also win one guaranteed winner. Again, the buyin is good but this suffers IMO from the same problem as the first satellite listed above. You need more than 31 players to award two avatar race seats at $216 a pop, and again there has not yet been 31 players in this thing, and even if there were, personally I prefer to spend a little more up front to get better odds than just one winner out of every 16 entrants. As with the first sat above, you basically need to win this thing outright in order to win your seat to the avatar race, and that's a pretty tall order for anybody of any skill level in my view.

8:10pm ET - $5 turbo rebuy nlh mtt, with one guaranteed winner. Now here is a structure I love and really excel at -- the rebuy satellite, but the problem here is the $5 buyin. Make this badboy a $15 buyin and I would be hooked. And I'd be playing in the avatar race every single night. But here I think full tilt screwed up, although I'm sure they are trying to make this thing affordable to the masses. And the result is that, even though I love the rebuy structure for an mtt satellite like this, this thing has never even been close to awarding more than one avatar race seat in its first several days of running. So for now I gotta stay away from this one as well, which really hurts since I own full tilt rebuy satellites.

8:20pm ET - $24 turbo nlh mtt, with one seat guaranteed. Now this is getting to be more up my alley. Yes you have to come up with a tier I token or $26 cash to buy in to this satellite, but at least it awards an avatar race seat for every 9 entrants. That's my kind of odds -- get 27 players, and the top 3 win seats. It's still not great, but it's doable and I'll probably play it most nights until I win one of these avatar race badboys.

8:40pm ET - $40 turbo nlh mtt, with one seat guaranteed. This is the last of the nightly avatar race satellites, and as is often the case on full tilt, the last one is also the best one, if you have the bankroll to buy in to it. In this case, it's a hefty $40 a pop to enter this satellite, but at least it awards one seat for every 5.4 players entered. So, if 22 people play in this 8:40pm ET satellite, then the top 4 will win avatar race seats. This is the kind of odds where I want to be, and I will probably be in this thing as well most nights when I'm online by 8:40pm.

As far as I'm concerned, there are only two things full tilt is missing with these avatar race satellites (not that you asked me). First as I mentioned above is a $14 or even a $20 rebuy satellite into the avatar race. I wish they would add this, but I find that somewhat unlikely as they already affirmatively chose to run a rebuy sat but elected to go with the lowest-common-denominator of $5 for the buyin/rebuy cost instead of a more winning-ratio-friendly higher number. The other thing I wish full tilt would do, which I think there is probably some chance of them adding if the avatar race does not start filling up a little more over the next week or two, is add a $75 tier II token buyin avatar race satellite. I know the buyin is a bit steep, but my roll can afford it (even after this weekend), and I would play that shiat probably every single night to get in to the nightly 10:30pm ET avatar race. I mean, they run a regular $75 satellite into the weekly $216 HORSE mtt, so why not into the nightly avatar race as well? I'm hoping they will consider this over the coming week or two to help stimulate action in the avatar race, which I have to say, after a weekend spent researching what's out there, has got to be the best overall value for getting in to a number of the FTOPS events for a minimal buyin.

That's all I got for today. Remember, I'll be hammered by the time you see me tonight at the virtual tables, probably in a few of the avatar race satellites I mentioned above, as well as possibly one or more of the 9 o'clock hour satellites to the midnight ET bracelet race. Come look for me because drunk Hoy is always a threat to give away his chips.

And speaking of giving away my chips, I'll see you tonight for Mondays at the Hoy on full tilt!

Labels: , , , ,